I have a new op-ed at the Arizona Republic that goes into the local implications of the chain of displacement that I described in a recent substack post.
Here are some visualizations and data sources cited in the op-ed.
Figure 1 compares the average hourly earnings for the US and for the Phoenix metro area.
The reference to a 90% increase in Phoenix’s median rent comes from Zillow. As Figure 2 shows, rent in Phoenix has been rising much faster than average for most of the past 8 years.
My estimate of the number of hours required to pay rent comes from combining these data, shown in Figure 3.
The rise in rents in Phoenix, as in most cities, has been highly sensitive to incomes. Using the Zillow rent index for each ZIP code and income data from the IRS, Figure 4 shows the relative change in rents across ZIP codes in the Phoenix metro area.
Figure 5 shows the rise in rent/income levels across Phoenix from 2015 to 2023, again using data from Zillow and the IRS. The figures cited in the AZCentral piece are based on two hypothetical ZIP codes with income approximated 20% above the poorest ZIP code and with income approximately 300% above the poorest ZIP code.
What's ironic is that Arizona shows a better rebound from the Great Recession in terms of housing starts than many other places. It's still not enough.
Yglesias has a good piece on housing this week. He singles out my home state of New Hampshire for particular criticism, which is entirely appropriate. Community level zoning regulations in that state are explicitly written, and modified periodically, to prevent new housing. How did Ben Cole phrase it?: "There are no atheists in foxholes, and there are no Libertarians when it comes to zoning."
Even Phoenix?
Am I reading this right?
It took forty hours of work a month to pay the rent in 2015 and now 60 hours a month?
Housing costs are undercutting living standards in so many places---Canada, Australia, London, Hong Kong, West Coast. NZ has gone nuts.
What gives?